I was recently invited to speak on the From Page to Practice podcast about the book How Learning Happens: Seminal Works in Educational Psychology and What They Mean in Practice by Paul A. Kirschner and Carl Hendrick. The first author does a great job of introducing the book at the beginning, and my lovely voice appears soon after, at about 11:25. Have a listen!


Series 3 – Episode 6 -The Metacognition Handbook by Jennifer Webb From page to practice

If you’re enjoying From Page to Practice, please consider showing your appreciation by buying me a coffee here:  https://www.buymeacoffee.com/fptppod it means a lot to know my time and effort is well received! However, the most important thing is that you download, listen and subscribe to the podcast. Make sure you share with friends and colleagues and if you feel able to, please post a quick review wherever you download your podcasts.
  1. Series 3 – Episode 6 -The Metacognition Handbook by Jennifer Webb
  2. Series 3 – Episode 5 – Education Exposed 2 by Sam Strickland
  3. Series 3 – Episode 4 – Habits of Success by Harry Fletcher-Wood
  4. Series 3 – Episode 3 – The Boy Question by Mark Roberts
  5. Series 3 – Episode 2 – The Feedback Pendulum by Michael Chiles

Should Teachers Know How Learning Happens?

It’s become a bit of a theme of this blog that increasing teachers’ knowledge of the learning sciences and educational psychology will improve students’ chances, strengthen our field, and empower teachers. Having never seen it personally, I can only imagine what a school would look like if everyone read and analyzed a book like “How Learning Happens” from cover to cover and used it to make substantive changes to their learning design. Unfortunately, it seems like many school leaders will find just about any excuse they can to not engage with the science of learning; There are too many competing items on the training agenda, there’s a standardized test coming up, teachers are the experts and know their kids best, every class and every school year is different, teachers are tired and should focus on self-care, the science is never settled or is too complex, etc, etc. Schools seem trapped in an endless cycle of reaction rather than proaction, and trial by fire learning rather than professional learning.

If school leaders won’t act to professionalize this field, then it’s up to us. Holding professional reading sessions where teachers inquire into an important article, evidence review, or book, is one way we can disseminate research and increase our collective knowledge at the grassroots. Below are a few resources to get your school started (off the top of my head, but all goodies) starting with a link to the book that was featured in the podcast:

Books

Evidence Reviews

Scientific Method and Debunking Materials

What is your school doing to increase teachers’ knowledge of education research and cognitive science? Have you read anything else that should be included on this list? Feel free to share in the comments below.

-Zach Groshell @mrzachg

9 thoughts on “Should Teachers Know How Learning Happens?

  1. Zach. This is great and really interesting. My question follows from the fact this is still very much from a white western scientific male framework. / world view. As a white western male I shouldn’t presume that this is the only way education occurs. What are the relevant sources for otter cultural and gender sources? Wha t is universal capital ‘E’ Education versus less universal lower case ‘e’ education that we make assumptions of being universal? (For example, as I’ve recently been shown, the learning pit stems from a western scientific view of time, and Gardner’s multiple intelligences is new and incomplete for the west but 1500 years old for other cultures and indigenous people).

    (To be clear, this is not veiled criticism, but a genuine question).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for commenting. The post isn’t advocating for a white western scientific male framework, but for teachers and leaders to engage with empirical findings, where an experiment is designed so that two equal groups receive the exact same intervention, except that one variable is manipulated. If there is a significant difference beyond chance between the two groups it can be assumed that it was the one altered variable that caused the difference. This contrasts, I know, with other ways of knowing, such as storytelling and anecdote, but there is no surer way to remove our biases and determine cause and effect than the scientific method

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s